|
The detailed account of her childhood helped me understand the place of the church in her young life and clarified not only her relationships with her parents but also how the young Anne Rice saw even the smallest things, including the wind's movement of leaves on a tree. Like Anne Rice, I've returned to the Roman Catholic Church after many years away. I found this book inspirational. I found the book honest and revealing in a way that many writers would not or could not be, including in her comments on contemporary issues later in the book that indicate she's come back to the church with a refreshingly open mind. Perhaps only other returnees to the Catholic Church after many years away can fully appreciate Anne Rice's refreshing honesty and detailed portrayal of her spiritual life.
I found this to be a very interesting and enlightening book, one that really rewarded the time I spent reading it. Rice for not spending sufficient time on this subject or that, but it must be remembered that this book is not really intended to be a complete autobiography.
Anne Rice, after years of being a committed atheist, had returned to the church of her youth, the Roman Catholic Church. This is the story of Anne Rice's spiritual journey, from her earliest experiences with church, through her youthful rebellion, her movement within the liberal/hippy community in San Francisco/Berkeley, and finally to her realizing that Christ was calling her to come back to her faith.Overall, I found this to be a very interesting book.
In October of 2004, Anne Rice, one of the most widely-read authors of modern America announced that she was leaving behind her award-winning gothic horror writing, and would henceforth focus all her time and talent on religious-themed books. I found the rest of the book to be quite an interesting read, one that gave me quite a good understanding of Anne Rice, and what made her tick.Some reviewers have criticized Ms.
The first part of the book is a bit heavy, with the author spending a great deal of time on her early impressions of the Catholic Church. In many ways it is a rose-colored glasses view of her time, but nonetheless it was her view.
Instead, it is a story of her spiritual journey, in which certain parts of her life featured larger than others. I highly recommend this book.
I was also quite interested in her view of women in the hippy movement, during the 1960s, it was quite enlightening. I don't know that I ever read an autobiography before that really so totally connected with the author's soul.It's a very good book, one that really shows you a lot about Anne Rice the person.
It starts out with her view of the Catholic Church as she saw it as a child, somewhat superficial as children can never really perceive the full picture of the world around them. In this wonderful book, American best-selling author Anne Rice traces her spiritual journey from childhood to present.
Her writing is filled not only with what happened, but what was going on emotionally inside of her. It then moves on to her slow and inexorable crisis in faith that led her to reject the church and God.
But then, surprising herself most of all, she found that God was not dead, and was reaching out to her every day.This is a great book, one that is written with such heart. I liked seeing through the pages how she grew and matured and changed throughout the years.
I loved this book, and recommend it to all.(Review of Called Out of Darkness: A Spiritual Confession by Anne Rice)
Exactly the type of scenario she describes as "made up words for Jesus according to what these communities thought should be made up" (read Mark 10:11 then Luke 16:18 and then Matthew 5:31 - a clear example of the Matthew community allowing for a provision of divorce that the Markan and Lukan communities did not). Anne naively circumvents almost all important critical scholarly issues in the study of historical and contemporary Christianity. I won't even get started about the horrendous crimes against humanity, intellectual repression, and barbarity Christianity is responsible for. Her return to the faith can be readily understood within the context of a person seeking comfort in her idealized catholic past after a troubled life, the loss of her mother to alcoholism, father re-marrying, daughter dyiny, husband dying, diabetes, etc. Her return to Christianity is done on an aesthetic and emotional basis.
Price - a book written to counter Rick Warren's the Purpose Driven Life - which Rice quotes. It took a lot of prodding to get through the early chapters - but from chapter 6 on -- where she's age 14 and then onto college, leaves the church, etc; it's a reasonably fast paced read to the end. I'm assuming here she is referring to Markan priority among the synoptic gospels, but this is not collaborative writing, but an author copying from a source, and making changes he sees fit. This is a grave error that challenges the teaching of the Bishops in the United States and elsewhere." -- Pope John Paul II in his talk to the Bishops in Los Angeles in 1987. I know of no scholars who think the communities were isolated (otherwise the entire theory of Markan priority would fall apart), or that the authors used "collaborative" writing. It shocks me that such a prolific writer as Anne Rice does not understand the literary relationship between the synoptic gospels.
I am an atheist, who read this book as a book-exchange (you read mine, i'll read yours) with a Catholic relative. And to say that Christ haunts you is perhaps a good description. down to the current day pope. I suppose given her repetitive statements throughout the book of her difficulty in academic matters we might not be surprised, but she completely fails to grasp critical biblical scholarship. Are the gospels to be trusted, who wrote them and why, when were they written. Afterwards she tries to justify her decision by ignoring the moral issues (pedophile priests, women's rights to choose, female ordination, a lack of ability for Catholics to plan their families responsibly, exclusion of homosexuals) and completely glossing over the intellectual issues (how did Christianity start, did Jesus really exist and if he did how do we know anything about him. How do we know that apostolic succession actually occurred from Peter (did he even exist). If we believe the miracles in the bible then why not believe miracles from any other wandering cynic or miracle worker.
As a former catholic, I think I understand the sense in which it never really leaves you (you can take the boy out of the church, but you can't take the church out of the boy). Her statement that "Not only do I find no evidence for isolated Gospel communities making up documents for their little groups, but I see no evidence of collaborative writing in the Gospels at all" is completing misleading. I have no issue with Anne going to mass, but her decision to do so is completely arbitrary and her reasoning in doing so is vacant of rationality that to me this "call out of darkness" does little but move some paper so as to keep her 49 employees, 5 houses, and 2 condos paid for. The pope and his predecessor have made this point very clear: "It is sometimes reported that a large number of Catholics today do not adhere to the teaching of the Catholic Church on a number of questions, notably sexual and conjugal morality, divorce and remarriage. How accurate are our translations and manuscripts.
As an amateur biblical scholar -- I take great exception to her quote that "It isn't simply a matter of finding sceptical New Testament scholarship so poor, so shallow, so irresponsibly speculative, or so biased" with no actual references to authors, their works, or the reasons for so being. Catholics are now allowed to choose which doctrines and dogmas they believe in. I have never read any of Rice's other books, but I actually found the book a mildly enjoyable read. If I had one message for Anne it is that she's a CINO (Catholic in Name Only). Anne's second delusion is that she's a Catholic. Some are reported as not accepting the clear position on abortion. If Anne wants to be a Catholic she must be against women's rights, female ordination, and accept that her son's sexual orientation is psychologically based, is contrary to the "natural law", and that he must remain forever chaste.Funny enough the book I gave to my catholic relative is the Reason Driven Life by Robert M. This is insolence beyond reproach.
However, how does Anne know this haunting isn't anything but a psychological delusion. It is sometimes claimed that dissent from the Magisterium is totally compatible with being a "good Catholic," and poses no obstacle to the reception of the Sacraments. ). Is she really being so audacious as to declare the likes of Bruno Bauer, Robert Ingersoll, Margaret Barker, Burton Mack, David Strauss, Albert Schweitzer, Robert Eisenman, Paul Tillich, Hermann Detering, Bart Ehrman, and Robert Price - men and women whose great scholarship has advanced the field of biblical studies (and who many of which are Christians) a pack of poor, shallow, irresponsible, biased scholars. It has to be noted that there is a tendency on the part of some Catholics to be selective in their adherence to the Church's moral teaching. I'll finish with one of my favourite quotes from Price's book: "If one has to choose between different authorities, not they but oneself is ultimate authority for oneself, and this means: there is no authority for him." - Paul Tillich
having just finished annes' books on the life of Jesus, i couldn't wait to read her account of her spiritual journey back to the Lord.i too am catholic, and i connected in many ways with her experiences in growing up in a catholic school. i found her insite very personal and inspirational.may God continue to bless you and cannot wait to read your next novel, possibly an account on our early church leaders,(saint peter and paul).thank you so much
|
